|

Arbitration
in Thailand
Enforcement
of Foreign Arbitral Award
Foreign
arbitral award refers to an award resulting from
arbitration, the proceedings of which were in
whole, or in the most part, conducted outside
Thailand and wherein one of the parties involved
in the dispute was not a person of Thai
nationality.
Under section 29 of the Arbitration Act of 1987,
a foreign arbitral award will be recognized and
enforceable in Thailand, only if it is made in
accordance with bilateral or multilateral
treaties or conventions which Thailand is a party
of or has acceeded to. |
|
Currently, these treaties and conventions
are the 1927 Convention on the Enforcement of Foreign
Arbitral Awards (Geneva Convention); the 1958 Convention
on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral
Awards (New York Convention); and the Treaty of Amity and
Economic Relations between the Kingdom of Thailand and
the United States of America.
The Arbitration Act of 1987 expressly states that the
action for enforcement of arbitral award (by way of a
confirmed judgment) must be initiated in a Thai court
within one year from the date the award was sent to the
parties by the arbitrators. The Act also states clearly
the preconditions for enforcement as well as the
reservations made by Thailand under both the Geneva and
New York conventions. For instance, the court may refuse
recognition if the subject matter of the dispute is not
resolvable by arbitration or the recognition would be
contrary to public policy or the good morals of Thailand.
In addition, it must be legally valid and final in the
country where the arbitration was held and at least one
of the parties to the dispute must be a subject of one of
the member countries of these conventions.
Entering
Arbitration
Thai courts will
compel arbitration if a written agreement to arbitrate
exists between the parties.
Interlocutory arbitration may be sanctioned by the courts
upon the written request from the litigants concerned, if
the courts view is that expeditions and fair
resolutions of the cases can be achieved by arbitration.
Such a request may be made at any time during the trial,
but must be submitted before the final judgment. An
arbitrator will be appointed pursuant to the agreement of
the litigants. Failing such an agreement, the court may
appoint any arbitrator as it deems appropriate.
Prehearing
Procedure
Pre-arbitration
remedies are available as temporary measures before
judgment. Good cause must be shown to the court by
a petitioner, that there is an urgent necessity to
protect his interests during the arbitration proceedings.
Temporary measures are granted by the court in the form
of orders for attachment, seizure, restraint or through a
cease or desist order.
There are no definite requirements regarding advanced
notice to the parties concerned. The court merely wishes
to be satisfied that an action by one party be made known
to the other party and that this party has sufficient
time to respond.
Procedure at the Hearing
Before giving an
award, the arbitrators are required to hear all the
parties and may make enquiries as they deem appropriate.
In the absence of a written agreement of the parties
concerned or an order of the court, the arbitrators are
also empowered to define issues or disputes and to adopt
their own rules and procedures for hearings. The parties
may present evidence and examine or cross-examine
witnesses during the arbitration proceedings. Through the
authority of the court, the arbitrators may summon
documents, subpoena witnesses and request witnesses to
testify under oath. The rules of evidence and procedure
stipulated in the Civil Procedures Code may be made
applicable to arbitration mutatis mutandis.
Arbitrators fees may be fixed by agreement of the
parties or by the courts. Witnesses fees may be
fixed by the arbitrators, taking into consideration the
going rates, which are generally approved by
the courts.
Institutional
Arbitration
An institutional
arbitration may be conducted in Thailand under the
auspices of either the Arbitration Tribunal of the Board
of Trade (The Thai Chamber of Commerce) or under the
rules called the Thai Commercial Arbitration
Rules, which were modeled after the ICCs
Conciliation and Arbitration Rules. The Arbitration
Office of the Ministry of Justice adopts its own
arbitration rules. These rules are quite comprehensive
and substantially reflect a constructive combination of
the ICCs, UNICITRALs and American Arbitration
Associations rules. The Office has maintained a
list of experts and experienced persons, 128 in total,
who are capable of serving as arbitrators in such areas
as labor, investment, international trade, maritime law,
intellectual property, insurance, land, minerals and
petroleum, torts and contracts, etc. The Office also
makes available to interested parties facilities and
office equipment for conciliation and arbitration
proceedings at a nominal cost.
Sources
of Law
The statutes that deal with the subject matter herein
are:
-
The
Civil and Commercial Code, Section 850-852 and
the Civil Procedure Code, Section 138, for
conciliation and compromising agreements;
-
The
Arbitration Act B.E. 2530 (1987) for
extra-judicial arbitration; and
-
The
Civil Procedure Code, Sections 210-222, for
interlocutory arbitration.
| Disclaimer: The information and opinions expressed on this
web site are not intended to be a comprehensive
study, nor to provide legal advice, and should
not be treated as a substitute for specific
advice concerning individual situations. SCM is
not responsible for the content of external internet sites which link to this site or which
are linked to from it. |
© 2001-2007 SCM International Law Office Ltd. |